Business Processes Implement Decision Governance. How?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6350/c6350de0284a4f672dde44e2edc2818b2f57bb9c" alt=""
A business process describes how something is done by highlighting mainly the actions to take, their dependencies (including their sequence), the roles in the firm who do these actions, as well as what triggers the process to start, and how we know when the process ends.
This text is part of the series on the design of decision governance. Decision Governance refers to values, principles, practices designed to improve the quality of decisions. Find all texts on decision governance here, including “What is Decision Governance?” here.
Business processes implement decision governance in several ways. It is useful to know this as it helps you read business processes differently, and if you need to redesign governance, know what to change to have the impact you are looking for.
- By showing who does what, processes show where decision rights and responsibilities are when work is being done. By changing who does what, you are changing the assignment of rights and responsibilities. This needs to make sense, or be coherent with what the organizational chart specifies, as well as policies that apply to the processes.
- Some of the actions in a business process will be clearly marked as decision points, which generate alternative paths throughout the rest of the process. Decision points will be assigned to specific roles, reflecting their decision rights and responsibilities. While that is obvious, the less apparent and more interesting question is what information leads to the decision point; to investigate that, you need to look at the path through the process, and preceding processes, and the outputs from actions along that path. What often happens is that this information is not clearly shown on the business process, yet is one of the most important things when trying to understand how the decision is supposed to be made in the process.
- Decision governance is also implemented within actions in a process. It is rare that actions are so simple that they give no autonomy, which in turn means that there are decisions being made when actions are performed. This implies that when you design decision governance, its implementation may result in changing how detailed the actions are specified in a process: if there is a decision made in an action, perhaps changes in governance require that action to be split into two, and the decision point clearly shown – possibly assigned to another role in the process.
- Every process has a process owner, or the organizational role that is accountable for the design and performance of that process, as well as for securing resources for it. Assignment of ownership is a key decision in any firm, given the importance of the rights and responsibilities it comes with. Assignment of process ownership is part of the foundations in the governance of a firm.
Decision Governance
This text is part of the series on the design of decision governance. Other texts on the same topic are linked below. This list expands as I add more texts on decision governance.
Introduction to Decision Governance
- What is Decision Governance?
- What Is a High Quality Decision?
- When is Decision Governance Needed?
- When is Decision Governance Valuable?
- How Much Decision Governance Is Enough?
- Are Easy Options the Likely Choice?
- Can Decision Governance Be a Source of Competitive Advantage?
Stakeholders of Decision Governance
- Who Is Responsible for Decision Governance in a Firm?
- Who are the Stakeholders of Decision Governance?
- What Interests Do Stakeholders Have in Decision Governance?
- What the Organizational Chart Says about Decision Governance
Foundations of Decision Governance
- How to Spot Decisions in the Wild?
- When Is It Useful to Reify Decisions?
- Decision Governance Is Interdisciplinary
- Individual Decision-Making: Common Models in Economics
- Group Decision-Making: Common Models in Economics
- Individual Decision-Making: Common Models in Psychology
- Group Decision-Making: Common Models in Organizational Theory
Role of Explanations in the Design of Decision Governance
- Explaining Decisions
- Simple & Intuitive Models of Decision Explanations
- Max(Utility) from Variety & Taste
- Expected Uncertainty to Unexpected Utility
- Perceptiveness & Experience Shape Rapid Choices
Design of Decision Governance
- The Design Space for Decision Governance
- Decision Governance Concepts: Situations, Actions, Commitments and Decisions
- Decision Governance Concepts: Outcomes to Explanations
- Slow & Complex Decision Governance and Its Consequences
Design Parameters of Decision Governance
Design parameters of decision governance, or factors that influence decision making and that we can influence through decision governance:
- Factors influencing how an individual selects and processes information
- Factors influencing information the individual can gain access to
Factors influencing how an individual selects and processes information in a decision situation, including which information the individual seeks and selects to use:
- Psychological factors, which are determined by the individual, including their reaction to other factors:
- Attention:
- Memory:
- Mood
- Emotions:
- Temporal Distance:
- Social Distance:
- Expectations
- Uncertainty
- Attitude
- Values
- Goals:
- Preferences
- Competence
- Social factors, which are determined by relationships with others:
- Impressions Of Others: How They Influence Decisions And How To Regulate Them
- Reputation
- Social Hierarchies:
- Social Hierarchies: Why They Matter for Decision Governance
- Social Hierarchies: Benefits and Limitations in Decision Processes
- Social Hierarchies: How They Form and Change
- Power: Influence on Decision Making and Its Risks
- Power: Relationship to Psychological Factors in Decision Making
- Power: Sources of Legitimacy and Implications for Decision Authority
- Power: Stability and Destabilization of Legitimacy
Factors influencing information the individual can gain access to in a decision situation, and the perception of possible actions the individual can take, and how they can perform these actions:
- Governance factors, which are rules applicable in the given decision situation:
- Incentives
- Rules
- Rules-in-use
- Rules-in-form
- Institutions
- Technological factors, or tools which influence how information is represented and accessed, among others, and how communication can be done
- Environmental factors, or the physical environment, humans and other organisms that the individual must and can interact with
Change of Decision Governance
- Public Policy and Decision Governance:
- Compliance to Policies:
- Transformation of Decision Governance
- Mechanisms for the Change of Decision Governance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/958c4/958c4974e9bd5df1b91e909cc7438bf99ae3948c" alt=""