Social Learning: How to Accelerate It

Several conditions can accelerate social learning, making individuals more likely to adopt behaviors, beliefs, or decision-making strategies observed in others. These conditions have been studied across psychology, sociology, economics, and network science. Below are the most influential factors that enhance the speed and effectiveness of social learning.

This text is part of the series on decision governance. Decision Governance is concerned with how to improve the quality of decisions by changing the context, process, data, and tools (including AI) used to make decisions. Understanding decision governance empowers decision makers and decision stakeholders to improve how they make decisions with others. Start with “What is Decision Governance?” and find all texts on decision governance here.

High-Status or Prestigious Models

High-status or prestigious models play a crucial role in social learning. People are more likely to imitate individuals they perceive as successful or knowledgeable, a phenomenon known as prestige bias. Research by Henrich and Gil-White (2001) showed that individuals selectively copy respected figures in domains relevant to them, while Boyd and Richerson (1985) argued that prestige-biased transmission is central to cumulative cultural evolution. For example, employees are more likely to adopt a new work method if senior executives endorse it.

Social Reinforcement and Repeated Exposure

Social reinforcement and repeated exposure further accelerate social learning, especially when behaviors require effort or commitment. When individuals receive multiple exposures to a behavior, their likelihood of adoption increases, a process referred to as complex contagion. Centola and Macy (2007) found that behaviors such as political activism or health habits require reinforcement from multiple social ties rather than one-time exposure. Similarly, Christakis and Fowler (2009) demonstrated that behaviors such as quitting smoking spread more effectively when individuals receive repeated encouragement from multiple social contacts. If several colleagues use a new software tool and repeatedly demonstrate its advantages, others are more likely to adopt it.

Observability of Behavior and Its Consequences

Observability of behavior and its consequences is another key driver of social learning. The speed of adoption increases when individuals can directly observe behaviors and their outcomes, making the reinforcement more salient. Bandura (1977) emphasized the role of vicarious reinforcement, where individuals learn from observed rewards and punishments. Similarly, Bikhchandani, Hirshleifer, and Welch (1992) found that information cascades accelerate when actions are publicly visible. For instance, if employees witness immediate benefits of a new workflow, such as faster task completion, they are more likely to adopt it.

Perceived Similarity Between Observer and Model

Perceived similarity between the observer and the model also influences the likelihood of social learning. Individuals are more inclined to imitate those they perceive as socially or professionally similar, a concept known as the homophily effect. Rogers (2003) found that the diffusion of innovations is stronger when the adopter sees the model as relatable. Mesoudi (2008) demonstrated that people preferentially learn from in-group members in culturally transmitted knowledge. A junior employee, for example, is more likely to adopt a strategy used by a mid-level manager in the same department rather than one from a different industry.

Perceived Risk and Clarity of Benefits

The perceived risk of adoption and clarity of benefits can significantly impact social learning. People are more likely to imitate a behavior when the perceived risks are low, and the benefits are explicit. Kahneman and Tversky’s (1979) prospect theory suggests that individuals weigh potential losses more heavily than gains, which can slow social learning unless risks are minimized. Centola (2010) found that behavioral adoption in online networks was faster when benefits were clearly demonstrated through early adopters. If a company offers training and support for a new technology, employees will feel less risk and adopt it more quickly.

Strong Social Networks and Frequent Interactions

Strong social networks and frequent interactions create an environment where social learning flourishes. Dense and well-connected social networks facilitate the rapid diffusion of learned behaviors. Granovetter (1973) found that weak ties spread novel information widely, while strong ties facilitate deeper behavioral reinforcement. Centola (2018) demonstrated that structured, clustered networks are more effective in spreading behaviors that require reinforcement. In an open-office setting where employees frequently interact, a new productivity method will spread faster than in a siloed work environment.

Institutional Support and Policy Endorsement

Institutional support and policy endorsement can further accelerate social learning. When organizations or authorities formally endorse behaviors, the speed of adoption increases. Cialdini and Trost (1998) found that injunctive norms, or what people perceive as officially approved, shape behavior. Paluck and Green (2009) demonstrated that top-down policies promoting diversity training were more effective when leaders actively participated. For example, a company’s official endorsement of flexible work arrangements leads to widespread adoption among employees.

Digital and Algorithmic Amplification

Digital and algorithmic amplification play an increasingly significant role in modern social learning. Social media and recommendation algorithms accelerate social learning by selectively exposing individuals to trending behaviors. Bakshy et al. (2012) found that social media platforms create filter bubbles that reinforce certain behaviors, while Lazer et al. (2018) examined how algorithms can either enhance or distort the learning process by amplifying misinformation. Viral online challenges, such as fitness trends, spread quickly due to algorithmic promotion.

Conclusion

In a summary, social learning accelerates under conditions where respected models demonstrate behaviors, reinforcement and repetition increase exposure, observability clarifies benefits, similarity between the observer and model exists, perceived risk is low, and benefits are high. Additionally, social networks facilitate interactions, institutional support provides legitimacy, and digital platforms amplify exposure. These conditions make social learning an efficient mechanism for spreading innovations, behaviors, and decision-making frameworks.

References

• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2012). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
• Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.
• Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329(5996), 1194–1197.
• Centola, D. (2018). How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions. Princeton University Press.
• Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill.
• Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. Little, Brown.
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
• Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
• Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., … & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.
• Mesoudi, A. (2008). An experimental simulation of the “copy-successful-individuals” cultural learning strategy: Adaptive landscapes, producer–scrounger dynamics, and informational access costs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(5), 350-363.
• Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual review of psychology, 60(1), 339-367.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.